Dental Cost Estimator

Dental Cost Estimator

We're done with price ambiguity

view case study

Setting the stage

A cost estimator was one of the most requested features for the app.

Users want to take the guess work out of getting their dental done. Working in tandem with the product managers and engineers on this team, I crafted the experience in a way that's functional and beautiful. This feature is currently in progress and being tested by our user researchers.

The scope

For MVP, the team wanted to focus on the 3 most common dental visit types: general check-ups, fillings, and crowns. The initial scope allowed users to have a cost estimation based on provider. The user could select their saved provider as well and get an estimate based on their costs.

Estimate by provider: user flow

Estimate by provider: designs

The pivot

As we were building both the cost estimator tool and the provider search, the engineering scope began to bloat. It was also a bigger effort to return a cost estimation based on a specific provider rather than an average based on zip code. The team decided to offset the provider search functionality and move to zip code estimation. Pivoting allowed us to focus more on providing more specific choices for each visit type: returning or new patient, filling locations, and crown types. It also allowed us to focus on adding in itemized costs of treatment.

Estimate by zip code: user flow

Final designs

Early research

In late June 2023, I partnered with the UX Researcher on the team to test drive the prototype I created.

What went well?
‍Users reacted positively to seeing the itemized treatment. They liked the transparency it provided as to how the cost was estimated and the average Beam pays per treatment.

What could be improved?
Some of the language choices for treatment types was hard for users to interpret. Example: "All White Crown" versus "Porcelain Crown". They also were confused as to why the costs were shown in ranges and wanted more specific estimates.

In late 2023, this tool was still in development. In late June 2023, I partnered with the UX Researcher on the team to test drive the prototype I created.

What went well?
‍Users reacted positively to seeing the itemized treatment. They liked the transparency it provided as to how the cost was estimated and the average Beam pays per treatment.

What could be improved?
Some of the language choices for treatment types was hard for users to interpret. Example: "All White Crown" versus "Porcelain Crown". They also were confused as to why the costs were shown in ranges and wanted more specific estimates.

Impact

The tool saw a 60% completion rate post-launch in July 2023

This project shows the impact of designing with user needs in mind. This completion rate was best-in-class for Beam's mobile app, outclassing all other products.

In late 2023, this tool was still in development. In late June 2023, I partnered with the UX Researcher on the team to test drive the prototype I created.

What went well?
‍Users reacted positively to seeing the itemized treatment. They liked the transparency it provided as to how the cost was estimated and the average Beam pays per treatment.

What could be improved?
Some of the language choices for treatment types was hard for users to interpret. Example: "All White Crown" versus "Porcelain Crown". They also were confused as to why the costs were shown in ranges and wanted more specific estimates.

Copyright: © Aubrey Casazza 2025 All rights reserved.

Copyright: © Aubrey Casazza 2025 All rights reserved.

Copyright: © Aubrey Casazza 2025 All rights reserved.

Copyright: © Aubrey Casazza 2025 All rights reserved.